Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Socio-economic Profile of Goat Rearing Farmers and Their Management Practices in Sylhet, Bangladesh

Md. Ariful Islam, Md. Nazmul Hossain, Sree Shawon Chokraborti, Sufianur Rahman, Anika Tasnim, Abdullah Al Zabir

Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International · pp. 1–10 · Published 1 Oct 2018

10.9734/JAERI/2018/43818

Abstract

The study aimed to find out the socio- economic profile of goat rearing farmers and to investigate the ongoing goat management practices in Sylhet district. One hundred and fifty goat rearing farmers from three districts of Sylhet were randomly selected for the study. The study revealed that a large number of respondent goat rearing farmers were middle- aged (56.67%) having a primary level education (36.67%) with large family size (55.33%). Majority of the farmers (59.33%) were labour, and most of them (81.33%) were married. Two third of the farmers were in the landless group having maximum 0.02- acre land and normally started their goat- rearing business by taking a loan from NGOs (48%) or invested their own money (49.33%). Half of the goat houses were made of tin, and most of them were without Macha (a platform little above the floor). About one- third of the farmers (36%) followed free- range system by only grazing their goat natural fodder (72.00%) and provided wheat bran (59.33%) as a concentrate feed. Most importantly, they never supplied water to the goat house. Black Bengal goat is the most preferred breed in the area. Majority of the farmers (66%) have partial knowledge about diseases, and among them, only 18.67% farmers followed regular vaccination schedule. One- third of the farmers used anthelmintic regularly. Village veterinary doctors were the main source of technical support. Moreover, 87.33% farmers buried the dead body of goat and threw (56.67%) the goat placenta to the outside. In case of a breeding system, 96.67% farmers used natural breeding and 69.33 hired bucks for breeding purpose.

Goat farming farm management socio-economics Sylhet

Cited by 10

Global Goat! Is the Expanding Goat Population an Important Reservoir of Cryptosporidium?

Kjersti Selstad Utaaker, Suman Chaudhary, Tsegabirhan Kifleyohannes · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · 2021

Socio-economic status of Pantja goat rearers of Uttarakhand

B S KHADDA, BRIJESH SINGH, S K SINGH · The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences · 2022

Rearing system, socio-economic status and common diseases frequency of goats in the Northern part of Bangladesh

Md. Rasel Prank, Md. Faruk Ahammed, Faysal khalequzzaman · Small Ruminant Research · 2023

Breeding objectives and trait preferences of Nguni goat farmers in Limpopo province, South Africa

Madumetja Cyril Mathapo, Thobela Louis Tyasi, Thinawanga Joseph Mugwabana · Tropical Animal Health and Production · 2025

Food security status of farming households in Bangladesh: A comparison of recipients and non-receivers of institutional support

Abdullah Al-Zabir, Camillus Abawiera Wongnaa, Md. Ariful Islam · African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development · 2020

Entrepreneurship in goat farming

Nitin Wakchaure, R.S. Sethi · Trends in Clinical Diseases, Production and Management of Goats · 2024

Evaluation of goat ovaries and follicles by histological study

SJ Shathi, MAMY Khandoker, S Debnath · Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science · 2022

Characterization of Goat Breeding Systems in Tunisia and In the Mediterranean Region

Hichem KHEMIRI, Khaoula ATTIA, Cyrine DAREJ · Genetics and Biodiversity Journal · 2022

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

10

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.