Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

A Survey of Literature on Theory and Empirics of Efficient Market Hypothesis

Mika’ilu Abubakar

Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting · pp. 1–8 · Published 26 Jul 2017

10.9734/AJEBA/2017/34688

Abstract

This survey organizes and summarizes existing theoretical and empirical seminal works on Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) for educational purposes. The theoretical models focus on random walk model which describes the behaviour of stock returns in an efficient stock market, that successive price changes are independent. The empirical implications of the theoretical model have been tested on the basis of types and forms of information available to an investor i.e. weak form, semi- strong form, and strong form efficiencies. The literature is almost unanimously in support of the random walk hypothesis for the weak form of efficient market hypothesis. On semi-strong form and strong form tests, the results are mixed. Especially for strong form whose tests are based on constructs that are not readily observed. The empirical survey of literature was extended to stock market anomalies which include calendar anomalies (such as day of the week effects, monthly (January) effects, and holiday effects), firm size effect, price/earnings ratio effect, momentum, book to market equity, and weather effect. Literature from this section revealed the existence of systematic discrepancies in returns corresponding with the various anomalies which is inconsistent with the theory of efficient market.

Efficient market hypothesis

Cited by 1

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.