Efficacy and Safety of Labor Induction by Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Teddy Habiragi Matega, Mike-Antoine Alongo Maindo, Amos Sivulyamwenge Kaghoma, Jean-Didier Nguma Bosenge, Noël Otuli Labama, Antoine O’yandjo Modia, Jean-Jeannot Syhalikyolo Juakali, Pascal Okenge Manga, Gédéon Bosunga Katenga
Asian Journal of Medicine and Health · pp. 104–116 · Published 23 Jan 2025
10.9734/ajmah/2025/v23i11168Abstract
Background: Labor induction is one of the most common practices in obstetrics in developed countries. But, in developing countries, its prevalence is low. This study seeks to compare the efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal Misoprostol in an area with limited resource. Patients and Methods: This is a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, conducted at Kisangani, in Democratic Republic of Congo, from September 1, 2022 to February 01, 2023. The study was prospective, had the approval of the ethics committee of Kisangani University, and women signed the informed consent. The sample was 177 patients, of which 89 received oral Misoprostol and 88 for vaginal route. Were included, primiparous and multiparous who controlled their date of last menstruation, and who had a term progressive pregnancy, mono-fetal, in cephalic presentation, fetal heart rate (FHR) within the norms, and had no contraindications of labor induction. Fifty micrograms of Misoprostol were administered either orally or vaginally every six hours. The primary outcomes were the time from drug administrations to uterine contractions, labor time, and vaginal delivery rate. For secondary outcomes, the course of labor as well as the maternal and perinatal prognosis was assessed. The data were encoded on an Excel 2013 sheet and analyzed using EPI INFO and SPSS software. Results: Labor was induced after 6.18±4.11 h for oral Misoprostol versus 4.03±1.99 h for the vaginal route (p=0.00). The duration of labor was 10.85±3.59 h for the oral route, 9.39±2.55 h for the vaginal route. The time from the first dose to delivery was 16.88±6.11 h for the oral route, 13.03±3.32 h for the vaginal route. The delivery rate within 24 hours was 98.9% (87/88) for the vaginal route and 88.8% (79/89) for the oral route (p=0.00). The rate of caesarean section was 6.7% for the oral route, 12.5% for the vaginal. Conclusion: Misoprostol is effective both orally and vaginally. Administered vaginally, it is associated with a reduction in the duration of labor, while it improves maternal and perinatal prognosis.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy of Oral Diclofenac Sodium in the Treatment of Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee in Nnewi, South Eastern Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Bacteriological and Fungal Evaluation of Three Brands of Disinfectants Sold in Calabar Municipality, Cross River State — shares topic coverage
- Drug Interactions, Safety and Efficacy of Probiotics — shares topic coverage
- The Efficacy of the Volume of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Used and Its Influence on Spinal Anaesthesia Induced Hypotension during Caesarean Section — shares topic coverage
- A Comparison of Efficacy of Two Brands of Enoxaparin in COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.