Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine Accelerate Recovery of Outpatients with Mild/Moderate COVID-19

Violaine Guérin, Pierre Lévy, Jean-Louis Thomas, Thierry Lardenois, Philippe Lacrosse, Emmanuel Sarrazin, Natacha Regensberg-de Andreis, Martine Wonner

Asian Journal of Medicine and Health · pp. 45–55 · Published 15 Jul 2020

10.9734/ajmah/2020/v18i730224

Abstract

Aims: The challenge regarding COVID-19 is to prevent complications and fatal evolution. Azithromycin (AZM) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have proven their antiviral effect in vitro. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of AZM alone or combined to HCQ, prescribed, at an early stage, in patients with Covid-19, in a primary care setting. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Patients have been followed by private practitioners in France, between March and April 2020. Methodology: Eighty-eight patients received either no or a symptomatic treatment (NST) (n=34) or AZM alone (n=34) or AZM+HCQ (n=20). The efficacy end point was the time to clinical recovery and the safety end point was the occurrence of cardiovascular events. To improve the evidence level, a case-control analysis was performed on a sample of 57 patients (19/group) matched for age, sex and BMI. Results: The mean (SD) times to achieve clinical recovery were respectively 25.8 days (11.1), 12.9 days (13.4) and 9.2 days (9.3), showing a statistically significant difference between NST and AZM alone (p<0.0001) or AZM+HCQ (p<0.0001). The statistical difference between NST and AZM was confirmed (p=0.0149) as well as the difference with AZM+HCQ (p=0.0002). No cardiac toxicity was recorded in any patient. No statistical difference was shown between AZM and AZM+HCQ groups, although the dual therapy tended to be more effective in patients over 50 years, based on an analysis using the cox model. Conclusion: AZM and AZM+HCQ favourably impacted the course of the disease. We need trials, ideally prospective/double blind, to show if a statistical difference can be evidenced with a broader group, and clarify the indications of each treatment depending on initial clinical presentation.

COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 azithromycin hydroxychloroquine primary care.

Cited by 20

Safety and Efficacy of Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Alberto Boretti · Asian Journal of Chemistry · 2021

Effect of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin on the mortality of COVID-19 patients: authors' response

Thibault Fiolet, Anthony Guihur, Mathieu Edouard Rebeaud · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · 2021

Azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19: a review

Daniel Echeverría-Esnal, Clara Martin-Ontiyuelo, María Eugenia Navarrete-Rouco · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · 2020

Natural history of COVID-19 and therapeutic options

Philippe Gautret, Matthieu Million, Pierre-André Jarrot · Expert Review of Clinical Immunology · 2020

Azithromycin through the Lens of the COVID-19 Treatment

Georgia G. Kournoutou, George Dinos · Antibiotics · 2022

Hydroxychloroquine / azithromycin in COVID-19: The association between time to treatment and case fatality rate

Roberto Alfonso Accinelli, Grisel Jesús Ynga-Meléndez, Juan Alonso León-Abarca · Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease · 2021

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

20

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.