Isolation and Identification of Potential Probiotics Bacteria from the Gut of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus in Uganda
Charles Drago Kato, Mark Benjamin Mugaanyi, Samuel Majalija, Andrew Tamale, Nathan Lubowa Musisi, Asuman Sengooba
Microbiology Research Journal International · pp. 1–8 · Published 2 Nov 2016
10.9734/BMRJ/2016/29721Abstract
Bacterial infections remain a hindrance to aquaculture expansion globally. Increased fish mortality and poor performance resulting from ill health has forced farmers to resort to the use of antibiotics globally. However, prolonged use of these drugs in aquaculture is becoming restrained as pathogens develop resistance to drugs and unpredicted long term effect on public health. Alternative approaches to control disease are proposed of which probiotics have come forward. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify potential probiotic bacteria in the guts of fish from different sampling sites around Kampala. Fish were obtained from selected cages, ponds, tanks and hatcheries around Kampala, including different parts of Lake Victoria. The fish were gutted and the guts aseptically swabbed with subsequent culture on both general purpose and selective media. The identification of various isolates was based on gram staining and biochemical tests. Probiotic screening was done using the agar spot method. Results revealed complete growth across all samples. The total microbial load was highest in the samples from the lake (1204.8±12.7 × 105cfu/g). Out of the three probiotic genera isolated, only Lactobacillus spp (LB) and Lactococcus spp (LC) showed antibacterial activity against selected pathogenic bacteria. The activity of LB was significantly (p< 0.0001) higher against Streptococcus spp (17.0±0.2 mm) as compared to Proteus at 9±0.02 mm and Pseudomonas (7.5±0.2 mm). Lactobacillus spp did not show any antimicrobial activity againstStaphylococcus aureus. For Lactococcus spp, probiotic activity was only detected against Proteus spp(5.5±0.2 mm). Although our study shows that Lactobacillus spp and Lactococcus spp possess probiotic activity against a number of pathogenic bacteria, characterization of these isolates is paramount before further manipulation.
Cited by 8
Adella Cika, Eric Armando, R. Wulan · AQUACOASTMARINE Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences · 2025
Philip Rwezawula, Wilson Waiswa Mwanja, Nick Vereecke · Frontiers in Microbiology · 2025
D. N, Anuanandhi K, S. D · International journal of zoological investigations · 2021
N. Sookchaiyaporn, P. Srisapoome, S. Unajak · Fisheries Science · 2020
M. Karthik, P. Saravanabhavan, T. Manjula · 2018
Akaniro Ifunanya, A. Obinna, Ofonegbu Mercy · 2020
M. Karthika, P. Bhavana, V. Seenivasana · 2018
Salah M. Aly, Noha I. ElBanna, Mohamed A. Elatta · North American Journal of Aquaculture · 2023
Related research
- Obesity: Multiple Biological Factors — shares topic coverage
- Drug Interactions, Safety and Efficacy of Probiotics — shares topic coverage
- Intestinal Dysbiosis in Systemic Inflamation and Possibilities of Its Correction with Probiotics — shares topic coverage
- P. pentosaceus Administration Attenuates the Severity of Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis and Improve the Intestinal Permeability — shares topic coverage
- Enhancement of Growth and Bioactivities of Probiotic Bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus as Influenced by Lactalbumin Hydrolysate and Inulin Supplementation in Skimmed Milk Medium — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
8
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.