Assesment of Biochemical Forage Quality of Sweet Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. saccharatum]
Abdullah Oktem, Celal Yucel, Ayse Gulgun Oktem
Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences · pp. 1–9 · Published 23 Feb 2021
10.9734/ajocs/2021/v9i319071Abstract
In this study, it was aimed to determine some forage quality characteristics of sweet sorghum genotypes in semi-arid climatic conditions. The experiment was set up in randomized complete block design with 4 replicates. Research was carried out in 2016 and 2017 under Harran Plain second crop conditions, Sanliurfa, Turkey. In the study 21 genotypes of sweet sorghum were used. Crude protein content, crude ash, acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), dry matter digestibility, dry matter consumption, were determined in the study. Significant differences were found between the genotypes for tested characteristics (P≤0.01). According to average of two years, crude protein content ranged from 4.20% (Tracy) to 5.90% (USDA S.Africa), crude ash from 4.44% (Theis) to 6.90% (Topper 76), acid detergent fiber (ADF) from 27.84% (Nebraska sugar) to 36.30% (USDA-Zaire). The highest NDF value was obtained from USDA-Zaire genotype (56.49%) whereas the lowest values were seen at N98 genotype (43.11%). Dry matter digestibility values were between 60.62% (USDA-Zaire) and 67.21% (Nebraska sugar), dry matter consumption between 2.14% and 2.85%. The highest relative feed value was obtained from N98 genotype (148.95) whereas the lowest values were seen at USDA-Zaire genotype (101.00). Net energy values ranged from 1.38 Mcal kg-1 (USDA-Zaire) to 1.50 Mcal kg-1 (Nebraska sugar). Considering the properties examined in terms of feed quality, it was seen that the crude protein content and net energy value was low. But ADF, NDF, digestible dry matter, dry matter consumption and relative feed values were within acceptable levels. Nebraska sugar, Topper 76, N98, Roma, M81E, Tracy and Corina genotypes were found as the best for forage quality in sweet sorghum. It was determined that sweet sorghum can be used as a forage source.
Cited by 6
Emine UYGUR GÖÇER, Yaşar KARADAĞ · Journal of Agriculture · 2022
Mızgin Göler, Mehmet Arif Özyazıcı · Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi · 2024
Olena O. Tigunova, Dzhamal B. Rakhmetov, Yaroslav B. Blume · The Open Agriculture Journal · 2024
Sinem Zere Taşkın, Fikret Yönter, Ugur Bilgili · Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science · 2025
Suat Kaplan, Celal Yücel, Muzaffer Denli · Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi · 2025
Breno Leonan de Carvalho Lima, Jucilene Silva Araújo, José Thyago Aires Souza · Sustainability · 2025
Related research
- Growth, Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Affected by Drip Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels through Fertigation — shares topic coverage
- Impact of NPK Treatments on Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L)) Yields for Biofuel Feedstock in Piedmont Region of North Carolina — shares topic coverage
- Early-Generation Evaluation of Marker-Assisted Transfer of bmr6 and bmr12 Alleles into Sweet and High-biomass Sorghum — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Supplementary Feeding on the Performance of Ankole x Friesian Crossbred Calves Grazed on Natural Pastures — shares topic coverage
- Study on the Impact of Season and Location on the Native Pastures’ Quality in West Timor, Indonesia — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
6
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.