Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Thinking Through Language: Revisiting Linguistic Relativity in Cross-Cultural Communication

Pankaj Vaishnav

Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences · pp. 153–164 · Published 1 May 2025

10.9734/arjass/2025/v23i5690

Abstract

This paper revisits the theory of linguistic relativity to explore its relevance to cross-cultural communication. Rooted in the work of Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf, the concept suggests that language influences the way individuals think and interpret the world. While strong determinism has been largely rejected, recent interdisciplinary research supports the idea that language shapes cognition in subtle but meaningful ways. Through a conceptual analysis of literature across linguistics, cognitive science, and intercultural communication, this study tries to identify three core themes: the influence of language on conceptual worldview, the causes of miscommunication in intercultural settings, and the practical implications for education and training. The paper argues that language education and professional communication training should go beyond structural competence to include awareness of cultural conceptualization. Though theoretical in scope, the study opens avenues for future empirical research and highlights the value of linguistic relativity in navigating today’s globalized, multilingual world.

Linguistic relativity cross-cultural communication intercultural pragmatics language and cognition language education

References (32)

  1. 1 Politeness [DOI]
  2. 2 Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization [DOI]
  3. 3 Discourse [DOI]
  4. 4 From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”
  5. 5 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach [DOI]
  6. 6 Intercultural Language Teaching and Learning [DOI]
  7. 7 From Communicative Competence to Symbolic Competence [DOI]
  8. 8 How Language Shapes Thought [DOI]
  9. 9 Linguistic Relativity [DOI]
  10. 10 Knowing versus Naming: Similarity and the Linguistic Categorization of Artifacts [DOI]
  11. 11 Spatial language and spatial representation: a cross-linguistic comparison [DOI]
  12. 12 The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance [DOI]
  13. 13 Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning [DOI]
  14. 14 Does Grammatical Aspect Affect Motion Event Cognition? A Cross‐Linguistic Comparison of English and Swedish Speakers [DOI]
  15. 15 Reconceptualizing intercultural communicative competence: A multinational perspective [DOI]
  16. 16 Cross-Linguistic Trade-Offs and Causal Relationships Between Cues to Grammatical Subject and Object, and the Problem of Efficiency-Related Explanations [DOI]
  17. 17 Congnitive Linguistics an Introduction [DOI]
  18. 18 Speaking of diversity: Can linguistic structural differences explain cultural values toward equity, diversity, and inclusion across the globe? [DOI]
  19. 19 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Analysing Speech Acts in Different Cultures [DOI]
  20. 20 Language and spatial frames of reference in mind and brain [DOI]
  21. 21 Intercultural Communicative Competence and English for Academic Purposes: A Synthesis Review of the Scholarly Literature [DOI]
  22. 22 Cross-cultural communication and miscommunication: The role of cultural keywords [DOI]
  23. 23 Politeness and the clash of interaction orders in cross‐cultural communication [DOI]
  24. 24 Metalinguistic relativity: Does one's ontology determine one's view on linguistic relativity? [DOI]
  25. 25 The Role of Language in Cross Cultural Bonds [DOI]
  26. 26 Reflective Glimpses of Culture in EFL Online Classes during COVID-19 Pandemic in Oman [DOI]
  27. 27 Language Learning Through a Cultural Lens: Assessing the Benefits of Cultural Understanding in Language Education [DOI]
  28. 28 Relationship Between Language and Thought: Linguistic Determinism, Independence, or Interaction? [DOI]
  29. 29 From Linguistic Relativity to Script Relativity [DOI]
  30. 30 Linguistic Relativity and Cognitive Science [DOI]
  31. 31 Editors’ Comment [DOI]
  32. 32 References [DOI]

Cited by 6

Linguistic Relativity in Gap X Katseye 2025 Instagram Advertisement: A Whorfian Weak Hypothesis Approach

Geubrina Ramadhani Iskandar, Fahri Salim, Jihan Azmi Kusmawan · Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif · 2025

Does Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis Apply on ChatGPT Responses? Yes, It Does

P. Ray · International Conference on Climate Informatics · 2025

Showing 4 of 6 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

77

Page views

0

PDF downloads

16

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.