Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Stakeholders’ Contributions to Rural Development in Mezam Division, Cameroon

Funwi Godlove Ngwa, Clarkson Mvo Wanie

Asian Journal of Geographical Research · pp. 51–69 · Published 19 Aug 2022

10.9734/ajgr/2022/v5i2135

Abstract

Rural development is a continuous process facilitated by stakeholders who play complementary roles. In rural Mezam Division notwithstanding, there exists a dearth of information on the stakeholder categories, their spatial distribution and intervention domains in the rural development process. This paper examines the stakeholder categories, their spatial distribution within the various sub-divisions and specific domains of intervention in the rural development process in Mezam Division. Field surveys, focused group discussions, interviews and the administration of 260 questionnaires constituted the main primary data sources while a review of institutional, library and internet sources served as secondary source materials of data gathering for this research. The collected data was analysed using descriptive techniques. The results categorized the rural development stakeholders in Mezam Division into four; state institutions (16%), Community Based Organisations (CBOs) (49%), Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) (27%) and Cooperative Development Agencies (CDAs) (8%). These stakeholders are unevenly concentrated within the four sub-divisions in Mezam Division as follows; Santa (33%), Bafut (28%), Tubah (23%) and Bali (16%).The areas of intervention of the stakeholders include water supply schemes (39%), school construction (20%), agriculture (17%), road maintenance (8%), health (7%), erection of community halls and palaces (5%) and electricity supply schemes (4%). The paper concludes that the rural populations should be fully empowered and their local institutions like the rural councils be made totally autonomous. In this way, the rural councils could easily rally the rural people, raise funds, execute projects, coordinate the activities of other stakeholders and serve as the custodian of rural development.

Stakeholders contribution rural development Mezam Division Cameroon

References (30)

  1. 1 World Bank. Rural Development. Sectoral policy paper. The WB. 1975;96.
  2. 2 Singh K. Rural Development: Principles, Policies and Management. 3rd Edition, SAGE Publishers. 2009;369. [DOI]
  3. 3 Acharya BR. Dimensions of rural poverty in Nepal. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology. 2008;2:189-192. [DOI]
  4. 4 IFAD. Fostering inclusive rural transformation. Rome, Quintily. 2016;378.
  5. 5 Nejadrezaei N, Ben-othmen MA. Rural development as a key to achieve zero hunger in 2030. In: Leal Filho W, Azul A, Brandli l, Özuyar P, Wall T. (eds) Zero hunger. Encyclopedia of the unsustainable development goals. Springer, cham; 2019. [DOI]
  6. 6 Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69626-3_43-2 [DOI]
  7. 7 Carney D. Approaches to sustainable livelihoods for the rural poor. Odi Poverty Briefing; January 1999.
  8. 8 UN. Reconsidering Rural Development. World Social Report. 2021;174.
  9. 9 UN. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1; 2015.
  10. 10 Okidegbe N. Rural poverty: Trends and measurement. The World Bank. 2001;80.
  11. 11 IFAD. Rural Poverty: The Bottom One Billion; 2011.
  12. 12 AVAILABLE:https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2011/03/rural-poverty-the-bottom-one-billion/#:~:text=There%20are%20currently%201.4%20billion,for%20Agricultural%20Development%20(IFAD)
  13. 13 Accessed 12/06/2022.
  14. 14 UN, World urbanization prospects: The 2007 revision, New York; 2008.
  15. 15 World Bank. Who are the poor in the developing world? Policy Research Working Paper 7844. World Bank Group. 2016;41.
  16. 16 OECD. Experiences on rural development from Sub-Saharan Africa: Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, in A New Rural Development Paradigm for the 21st Century: A Toolkit for Developing Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris; 2016.
  17. 17 Available:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264252271-10-en [DOI]
  18. 18 Keats S, Wiggins S. Population change in the rural developing world: Making the transition. Briefing Paper; 2016.
  19. 19 Kumar HA. Socio-Economic Analysis of Conditions of Marwa Village of Jharkhand. ERN: Urban & Rural Analysis in Developing Economies (Topic); 2018. [DOI]
  20. 20 Chandararot K, Liv D. Rural development and employment opportunities in Cambodia: How can a national employment policy contribute towards realization of decent work in rural areas? International Labour Organization. 2013;58.
  21. 21 Winklmaier J, Santos SAB, Trenkle T. Economic Development of Rural Communities in Sub-Saharan Africa through Decentralized Energy-Water-Food Systems. In (Ed.), Regional Development in Africa. Intech Open; 2020. [DOI]
  22. 22 Available:https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90424. [DOI]
  23. 23 Amungwa FA, Baye F. Training for Development: The case of Agricultural Family Schools in Cameroon. The Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies. 2002;43(3):323-340.
  24. 24 Mbanga LA. Regional Institutions in Rural Council Area Development in the North West Region, Cameroon. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2015;8(1):93-107. [DOI]
  25. 25 Ndenecho E, Akum K. Spatio- temporal analysis of micro financing for agricultural innovation diffusion in Mezam division, Cameroon. International NGO Journal. 2009; 4(3):057-065.
  26. 26 Bafut Development Association. The Bafut Manjong annual report on Bafut development activities in water supply, education, health, transport and Bafut annual dance and language (2019). Unpublished Report; 2019.
  27. 27 Bali Council. Council report on water and energy supply, road maintence, support to agriculture and education in Bali sub-division. Unpublished Report; 2019.
  28. 28 Tubah Council. Council annual report on development of water and energy, transport, market, education and tourism sectors in Tubah. Unpublished Report; 2019.
  29. 29 Santa Council. Annual report on planning and development in education, agriculture, water supply, culture and health in the Santa Municipality. Unpublished Report; 2019.
  30. 30 SHUMAS Report. Annual report of SHUMAS activities I agriculture and environment, education, water and sanitation, women empowerment and health. Unpublished Report; 2019.

Cited by 2

An Analysis of Strategies of Urban and Rural Community Associations in Executing Projects in Mezam Division, Cameroon

William Shu Neba, Pius Tangwe Tanga · International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) · 2025

Agriculture, Ecosystem Functions, and Services in the Congo Basin

Lucie Félicité Temgoua, Nyong Princely Awazi, Denis Jean Sonwa · Resilience and Sustainability in the Congo Basin · 2026

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.