Insecticidal and Repellent Effects of Azadirachta indica and Calotropis procera Extracts on Bactrocera dorsalis in Senegal
Pape Modou Guèye, Babacar Sadikh Yatte, Youssoupha Diop, Diégane Sarr, Diène Diégane Thiaré, Cheikh Sall, Amy Collé Gueye Cissé, Atanasse Coly
Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences · pp. 50–62 · Published 3 Sep 2025
10.9734/ajocs/2025/v15i5390Abstract
The introduction of new regulations in the field of food safety has resulted in the withdrawal of numerous synthetic active substances from the market, due to their unacceptable adverse effects on human and animal health. The aim of this work is to study the insecticidal or insect repellent effect of two plants on the fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis, with a view to using them as alternatives to synthetic pesticides. Therefore, Azadirachta indica (A. indica) and Calotropis procera (C. procera), two species that are very abundant in almost all regions of Senegal, were chosen. Extractions of leaf and bark powders from the two plants were carried out using methanol and acetone as solvents. This study showed that extraction yields were higher for leaves than for barks, regardless of the species studied. Phytochemical characterisation of the extracts from plant organs for these two species revealed the presence of several secondary metabolites (alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins and terpenoids), in different proportions. These different metabolites showed no insecticidal effect against this fly. On the other hand, the greater or lesser presence of these secondary metabolites in the different species studied resulted in insect repellent effects. For Azadirachta indica, acetone is more appropriate for extracting leaves, whereas methanol seems to be the most appropriate for bark. However, for Calotropis procera, the opposite effect was obtained. In Azadirachta indica, the terpenoid content is higher in the crystalline and non-crystalline leaf fractions (++) than in the non-crystalline bark fractions (+). In both cases, it was found that P-value = 0.039 < 0.05, indicating that both tests were significant. Indeed, in the case of Azadirachta indica, a repellent action was observed against flies, while in the case of Calotropis procera, an attractive action was noted. These insect repellent effects were obtained using methanolic and acetone extracts of A. indica and C. procera leaves at doses of 5, 10 and 20 mg/mL, respectively. Thus, these two plants studied can be used as alternatives to insecticides in the control of the Bactocera dorsalis fly, which devastates mangoes.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Ameliorative Histological Effects of Aqueous Neem Leaf Extract (Azadirachta indica) on Lead Induced Neurotoxicity of Lateral Geniculate Body of Adult Wistar Rats — shares topic coverage
- Antifungal Activity of Various Plant Extracts against Aspergillus and Penicillium Species Isolated from Leather-Borne Fungus — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of Tyrosinase Producing Endophytic Fungi from Calotropis gigantea, Azadirachta indica, Ocimum tenuiflorum and Lantana camara — shares topic coverage
- Enhancing Soil Fertility Status, Sweet Potato Yield and Tuber Nutrient Composition through Different Manure Sources in Southeastern Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Reversibility, Body Weight and Histo-architectural Alterations in the Anterior Pituitary Gland of Aqueous Azadirachta indica Extract Fed Wistar Rats — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.