Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Gongronema latifolium and Costus afer Leaf Extracts on E. coli (ATCC 29455) and S. aureus (ATCC 25923)
N. P. Akani, C. Nwachukwu, I. O. Hakam
International Journal of Pathogen Research · pp. 11–16 · Published 21 Nov 2020
10.9734/ijpr/2020/v5i430139Abstract
Man’s use of medicinal plants in treating illnesses is as old as human existence and many plants have been used for this purpose because of their phytochemical constituents that prove many times to be antimicrobial. The antibacterial activity of the leaf extract of Gongronema latifolium and Costus afer on Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25923) was investigated using standard microbiological procedures of sub-culturing, identity confirmation, water and ethanol extraction of leaves and sensitivity testing via agar well diffusion method. Results revealed that S. aureus and E. coli were both inhibited by the aqueous extract of C. afer with zone diameter of 16 mm and 15 mm respectively as well as the ethanolic extract of C. afer with diameter of 18mm and 15 mm respectively. However, aqueous and ethanolic extracts of G. latifolium proved ineffective against the strains of E. coli and S. aureus used in this study. Results of minimum inhibitory concentration revealed MIC of the aqueous extract of C. afer on E. coli and S. aureus to be 50 mgml-1 and 25 mgml-1 respectively while that of the ethanolic extracts of C. afer was 12.5 mgml-1 and 6.25 mgml-1 for E. coli and S. aureus respectively. Comparatively E. coli showed high sensitivity to Ciprofloxacin, Gentamycin and Septrin with zones of inhibition of 37, 32 and 24 respectively and resistant to Ampicillin, Erythromycin and Tetracycline with zones of inhibition of 6, 0 and 0 respectively. S. aureus on the other hand proved sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Gentamycin and Tetracycline with zones of inhibition of 35, 28, 29 and 34 respectively and resistant to Ampicillin and Septrin with zones of inhibition of o respectively. This study has revealed that some positive effect can be achieved against S. aureus and E. coli infections using C. afer at good concentrations. Better results could also be achieved using ethanol as extracting medium with instead of water as is common practice.
Cited by 6
Nikhil Patil, Sarika Wairkar · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · 2024
Ifeanyi Merenini, Peter Upla, Ephraim Ezaka · Lafia Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research · 2024
U. D. Enyidi, F.O Ike · Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology · 2025
Jean-Paul Nzambi Divengi, Assumani Zabo Idrissa, Dorah Mwenyi Kabasele · Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International · 2022
Chantal Zinga, Kalulu Taba, Gauthier Mesia · Seminars in Nephrology · 2022
Gideon Ampoma Gyebi, Oludare M. Ogunyemi, Ibrahim M. Ibrahim · Molecular Diversity · 2023
Related research
- Antibacterial Activities of Streptomyces collinus and Streptomyces refuineus from Cocoa, Orange and Timber Plantation Soils in Akure Metropolis — shares topic coverage
- Antimicrobial Activity, Phytochemical Screening and Nutrient Analysis of Tetrapleura tetraptera and Piper guineense — shares topic coverage
- Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of the Crude Ethanolic, Methanolic and Aqueous Bark and Seed Extracts of Citrullus lanatus Fruit — shares topic coverage
- Susceptibility of Some Clinically Resistant Bacterial Isolates to Thyme Essential Oil, Chitosan and Lactobacillus reuteri — shares topic coverage
- Antibacterial and Antifungal Effect of Cinnamon — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
6
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.