Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Reproducible, Repeatable and Clinically-relevant Hemostasis Scoring

Julianne M. Siegel, John F. Cummings, Jeffrey W. Clymer

Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences · pp. 30–39 · Published 16 Aug 2014

10.9734/JAMPS/2014/11653

Abstract

Background: Although the assessment of hemostasis is frequently performed during stapling procedures, and is necessary during product development, there is currently no widely-accepted scoring system for its evaluation. In order to better measure stapler performance, we developed a 5-point Likert-type scale to evaluate intra-operative bleeding in stapling applications. Methods: The scale was evaluated internally by novice and experienced appraisers, and then used by 154 surgeons that viewed video segments of stapling in pig that displayed varying levels of hemostasis. Results: Reproducibility and repeatability of the scale among internal appraisers, as well as the surgeons, was excellent with Kendall’s W of 0.94-0.98 (repeatability) and 0.93-0.95 (reproducibility) internally and 0.85 and 0.95, respectively for surgeons. More than 90% of surgeons felt the hemostasis scale was clinically relevant for evaluating hemostasis during stapling. Conclusions: The scale should be a useful tool in assessing hemostasis with high confidence in its repeatability and reproducibility.  

Hemostasis stapling score

Cited by 18

The SPOT GRADE: A New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding

W. Spotnitz, D. Zielske, Valerie Centis · Spine · 2017

A novel narrow profile articulating powered vascular stapler provides superior access and haemostasis equivalent to conventional devices

C. Ng, A. Pickens, Julianne M. Siegel · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2015

Improving Hemostasis in Sleeve Gastrectomy With Alternative Stapler

James G Redmann, T. Lavin, M. French · Jsls-journal of The Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons · 2020

World Journal of Surgery and Surgical Research

Jeffrey W. Clymer, J. Pineda, JW Clymer

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

18

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.