Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Bias in Recruited Sample Research on Children with Same-Sex Parents Using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

D. Paul Sullins

Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 375–387 · Published 10 Jan 2015

10.9734/JSRR/2015/15298

Abstract

Aims: To test for the presence of bias on use of a common psychometric instrument, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), in studies of children with same-sex parents using a recruited convenience sample. Study Design: Non-parametric quasi-experimental two-group comparison. Methodology: Results from five qualifying studies, two with random samples and three with recruited samples, were compared with normative population data, assessing the percent of comparisons favorable or unfavorable to children with same-sex parents for six subscale measures. Results: In the recruited samples 79.3 % (range: 75-83) of comparisons were favorable to children with same-sex parents, compared with no favorable comparisons (0%, range 0-0) in the random samples. Two additional random samples with related measures were also adduced, also with no favorable comparisons (0%, range 0-0). Conclusion: Evidence suggests strong bias resulting in false positive outcomes for parent-reported SDQ in recruited samples of same-sex parents.

Same-sex parents child emotional problems strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) survey bias.

Cited by 10

A Review and Critique of Research on Same-Sex Parenting and Adoption

Walter R. Schumm · Psychological Reports · 2016

Invisible Victims: Delayed Onset Depression among Adults with Same-Sex Parents

D. Paul Sullins · Depression Research and Treatment · 2016

Growing up with Gay Parents: What is the Big Deal?

Richard P. Fitzgibbons · The Linacre Quarterly · 2015

Growing up with Gay Parents: What is the Big Deal?

Richard P. Fitzgibbons · The Linacre Quarterly · 2016

Statement: A Response to the Academy of Science of South Africa's Diversity in Human Sexuality Report

The Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity · The Linacre Quarterly · 2016

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

10

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.