Comparative Profitability of Plant and Ratoon Methods of Sugarcane Cultivation in Kamareddy District of Telangana, India
Vaishnavi Varala, B. Sowjanya, I. Shakuntala Devi, P. Prashanth
Archives of Current Research International · pp. 818–825 · Published 24 Jul 2025
10.9734/acri/2025/v25i71381Abstract
Aims: The study aimed to analyze and compare the cost of cultivation, profitability and farm income measures between fresh (plant) and ratoon sugarcane cultivation methods. Study Design: A comparative economic analysis was conducted using structured cost concepts and farm income indicators across both methods of sugarcane production. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in Kamareddy district, Telangana, during the 2023–2024 cropping season. Methodology: Primary data were collected from a sample of 80 sugarcane farmers (40 plant crop and 40 ratoon sugarcane farmers) through personal interviews using a pre-tested schedule. The data was analyzed using cost concepts such as Cost A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, and C3. Farm profitability was assessed through gross returns, net returns, cost of production per quintal, farm business income, family labour income, and farm investment income. Results: The total cost of cultivation was ₹2,57,936.66/ha for plant and ₹1,73,729.05/ha for ratoon sugarcane crop. Variable costs accounted for 93.4 per cent and 92.08 per cent of total costs respectively in plant and ratoon, where machine and human labour occupying major share. Cost concepts (A1 to C3) were consistently higher for plant cane. The Gross returns were also higher in plant sugarcane (₹3,57,102 /ha) than in ratoon cane (₹ 2,76,426/ha). However, ratoon sugarcane recorded a higher net income (₹1,02,696.94/ha), a lower cost of production (₹169.69/q), and a higher B:C ratio (1.59) when compared to plant cane, which had a net income of ₹99,165.33/ha, a higher cost of production (₹195.02/q), and a lower B:C ratio (1.38). Income indicators such as farm business income and family labour income were also slightly higher in ratoon cultivation. Conclusion: While plant sugarcane offers higher gross income due to superior yields, ratoon sugarcane provides better net returns, cost efficiency, and profitability. Thus, ratoon cropping is a more economically viable option under the studied production conditions.
Cited by 2
2 citations reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- Comparative Economics of Maize Cultivation under Conventional and Mechanization — shares topic coverage
- Assessment of Post-harvest Losses of Major Vegetables in Rangareddy District of Telangana — shares topic coverage
- Study on the Cost of Cultivation, Returns, and Benefit-Cost Ratio of Betel Vine Farmers in Different Farm Groups in Bankura District, India — shares topic coverage
- Economic Analysis of Papaya Farming in Chitradurga: Production and Marketing Perspectives — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Different Fertilizers and Approaches on Nutrient Use Efficiency and Economics of Aerobic Rice Under Rice-Cowpea Cropping Sequence in Ecological Conditions of Karnataka, India — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.