Comparison of Water Quality Index Values and Groundwater Quality Making Use of Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study
B. Vamsi, Soniya Chowdary Anatha, T. Dheeraj, K. Upendra, T. Gowri Pravallika, N. Gnanasri, R. Anjanadevi, G. Siri Vennela, G. Madhusri, T. Hemalatha, B. Praveen Kumar
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports · pp. 310–320 · Published 23 Jan 2026
10.9734/ajarr/2026/v20i11269Abstract
The variation in groundwater quality resulting from societal changes is a matter of concern, as groundwater is considered as one of the most vital sources of water supply among all available resources. Assessing water quality through systematic monitoring provides a basis for determining its suitability for various purposes, including effective water quality management. The present study focused on leveraging a hierarchical reconciliation algorithm (HCA) for forecasting water quality parameters and the Gradient Boosted Tree, Decision Tree and Random Forest models to predict Water Quality Index (WQI) values. This study was based on the experimental results conducted for monitoring and evaluating the quality of groundwater samples collected from two locations namely, Mudirajupalem and Lingayas Institute of Management and Technology (LIMAT), Vijayawada campus, Krishna district, Andhra Pradesh, India for the parameters, such as alkalinity, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), total hardness (TH) and acidity using standard methods. The pH value was in the range of 8.5-10 for the Mudirajupalem samples, whereas pH value in the range of 6.5-8.0 was obtained in the LIMAT campus samples. It was reported that a range of 460-850 mg/L alkalinity was obtained in the Mudirajupalem samples, whereas a range between 550-750 mg/L of alkalinity was obtained in the LIMAT campus samples. Very high values of TDS were obtained in the Mudirajupalem samples with a range between 931-994 mg/L, whereas TDS values ranged between 199-273 mg/L in the LIMAT campus samples. It was reported that TH ranged between 20-246 mg/L for the Mudirajupalem samples, whereas for the LIMAT campus, TH values were in the range of 0-230 mg/L. Groundwater from LIMAT campus and Mudirajupalem samples showed the WQI values in between 39.59 to 41.01 and 396.73 to 397.09, respectively, which confirms that Mudirajupalem groundwater is not fit for public consumption. The foreseen WQI values were found to be similar with the results obtained via experiments, reinforcing the conclusion that the groundwater in Mudirajupalem is unsuitable for public consumption. Additionally, the HCA, which was employed for forecasting key water quality parameters proved to be effective. This study demonstrated promising results in predicting groundwater quality, opening up opportunities for further research into the use of advanced machine learning techniques to achieve even more accurate long-term groundwater quality predictions.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Detecting Dental Caries through Captured Images Using the Machine Learning Technology Teachable Machine — shares topic coverage
- Prediction of Radiotherapy Dose Distribution for Glioblastoma Using Convolutional Neural Network Model — shares topic coverage
- A Systematic Literature Review of Machine Learning Methods in Healthcare — shares topic coverage
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review — shares topic coverage
- Artificial Intelligence in the Analysis of the Fetal Genome in Utero: A Critical Review of Current Paradigms, Clinical Utility and Future Horizons — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.