Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Reliability Measure in Social Science Research: Some Conceptual Issues

S. Sathyanarayana

Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting · pp. 472–483 · Published 26 Feb 2026

10.9734/ajeba/2026/v26i22192

Abstract

Reliability measurement plays a significant role in making social science study credible. Reliability represents the extent to which the measurement tool provides consistent, stable, and consistent results when the tool is implemented in similar conditions. In social science studies, since it is difficult to measure abstract social phenomena, social science researchers make use of standardized measuring devices such as questionnaires to produce empirical data. In this paper, the concept of reliability in measurement, different types of reliability for social science study, the applicability of reliability for social science study, issues faced by the researcher while conducting a study on reliability in social sciences, and how the reliability could be improved while conducting a study in social science fields will be discussed. The reliability concept of social science study could be in one of the following types: test-re-test reliability, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency reliability, parallel forms reliability, and split-half reliability. The paper further highlights the role of reliability in reducing measurement error, increasing the confidence of theory testing, enhancing the quality of publications, and providing better relevance to policy measures. The applications of reliable measurement in psychology, sociology, management, education, and political science are highlighted field-wise to demonstrate practical utility. In addition to that, the significant challenges that are involved, such as cultural differences, language barriers, biases of the respondents, as well as items that are not well constructed, are discussed critically. The strategies that are used to improve the measure effectively are discussed next. Finally, the paper emphasizes that there is a continuous need for assessing reliability and integrating more advanced approaches toward methodological rigor in research. In this way, this paper underlines reliability as a bedrock for scientifically sound and socially meaningful research.

Social science Cronbach’s alpha reliability statistics items scale development

Cited by 2

2 citations reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.