Exploring the Use of AI-Powered Chatbots and Writing Assistants on Academic Integrity in Zambia’s Higher Learning Institutions
Chanda Chansa Thelma, Memory Mumbi, Zohaib Hassan Sain, Domboka Robert Pedzisai, Boyd Mweemba, Chisebe Sylvester
Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 285–300 · Published 29 Mar 2025
10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i4620Abstract
AI-powered chatbots and writing assistants are transforming academic practices in Zambia’s higher learning institutions, raising both opportunities and challenges concerning academic integrity. These tools enhance student learning by providing instant feedback, improving writing quality, and assisting with research; however, they also pose ethical concerns related to plagiarism, authenticity, and critical thinking skills. The ease of access to AI-generated content increases the risk of academic dishonesty, as students may misuse these technologies to complete assignments without genuine effort. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the effect of AI-powered chatbots and writing assistants on academic integrity. The study adopted a mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study was conducted in three higher learning institutions within Lusaka district of Zambia and sampled 345 respondents. The data collection process involved distributing the questionnaires to the selected participants and conducting individual interviews. Also, document analysis was utilized as secondary data collection tool. The data collected were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods, such as SPSS and Microsoft excel as well as research themes. The findings revealed that while these AI tools enhance students' access to instant academic support, they also contribute to increased risks of academic dishonesty. Additionally, the effectiveness of institutional policies in mitigating AI-related academic misconduct remains limited due to inadequate enforcement mechanisms and lack of awareness among students and educators. On the other hand, the study also revealed limitations such as limited awareness and usage, self-reported data bias, ethical and privacy concerns, evolving AI capabilities and lack of localized AI models. Therefore, the study recommended that universities should strengthen academic integrity policies by implementing standardized AI-detection tools, conducting regular faculty and student training, and fostering a culture of academic honesty through awareness campaigns and stricter enforcement mechanisms.
Cited by 1
1 citation reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- The Strengths and Drawbacks of E-resources in Higher Education — shares topic coverage
- A Swot (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) Evaluation of University Student-Staff Partnerships in Co-creating Educational Resources, Peer Support and Research Within STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics) Subjects — shares topic coverage
- Anxiety in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review — shares topic coverage
- Comparison of Differences in TOEFL and TEM and Its Implications for Chinese Higher Education — shares topic coverage
- Forecasting Student Enrollment Trends in Hotel Catering and Institutional Management at Kumasi Technical University — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.